| Topics |
Headnote |
Judgement |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
|
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Improvement in Evidence — Duty of the Court — is to separate chaff from the husk and to dredge the truth from the pandemonium of Statements. (Para 24) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Criminal trial — Previous enmity — inference of — Held, cannot establish the guilt of accused beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 21) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Condonation of delay —Interest of Justice —Duty of Judiciary — It must be grasped that judiciary is respected not on account of its power to legalize injustice on technical grounds — but because it is capable of removing injustice and is expected to do so — Making a justice-oriented approach from this perspective, there was sufficient cause for condoning the delay in the institution of the appeal —Delay condoned. (Para 9) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Substantial Justice vis-à-vis Technical Considerations — Held, When substantial justice & technical considerations are pitted against each other— cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred — for the other side cannot claim to have vested right in injustice being done because of a non-deliberate delay—Condonation of delay — Limitation Act — Section 3. (Para 9) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Culpability of the accused —judging of — Held, the circumstances adduced when collectively considered, must lead only to the irresistible conclusion — that the accused alone is the perpetrator of the crime alleged — That the circumstances established must be of a conclusive nature — consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused — was emphatically propounded. (Para 12) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Criminal Trial — Suspicion — Held, in a criminal trial, suspicion, howsoever grave, cannot substitute proof. (Para 11) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Vicarious liability — Principle of — Held, except in some matters IPC does not contemplate any vicarious liability on the part of a person. (Para 17) |
PDF |