| Topics |
Headnote |
Judgement |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
|
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Duty of Court — Pervert litigations — Curbing of — Held, when pervert litigations takes this route to harass their fellows citizens, efforts are to be made to scuttle and curb the same. — Priyanka Srivastava & Anr. vs. State of U.P —ABC (2015)II 35(SC)—referred. (Para 9) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Subjecting the police officers to criminal prosecution — on vague allegations — will affect the morale and effective functioning of the police machinery — which in turn have serious and far reaching adverse impact on the interest of society. (Para 14) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Principle — Charge — Proving of — a charge can be said to be proved — only when there is certain and explicit evidence to warrant legal conviction — No person can be held guilty on pure moral conviction — Rajiv Singh versus State of Bihar & Anr — relied. (Para 15) |
PDF |
| CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE |
Criminal Jurisprudence — Interpretation of Statute — Proof— interpretation of— In a sense, proof is antonyms to the presumption—L.D. Satapara versus State of Gujarat — relied. (Para 15) |
PDF |